Feature Requests

Expand all | Collapse all

Add Relationship Type to Trace View options

  • 1.  Add Relationship Type to Trace View options

    Posted 03-09-2018 20:12
    We need to be able to filter the Trace View export based on Relationship Type.
    The Trace View currently treats all relationships alike.  But, we need to distinguish "Derived From" relationships from "Related To" and "Verified By" relationships.  If there were an option to include the Relationship type as columns in the export, we could filter the export based on the relationship type.

    ------------------------------
    Debra Shannon
    Sentek Global
    San Diego CA
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Add Relationship Type to Trace View options

    Posted 05-15-2019 16:13
    There is no way to do this? That's unfortunate. My test group is currently using different relationship types to differentiate whether a test procedure is planned or fully implemented. Without the ability to show this in trace views, showing proper coverage is going to be difficult without asking the teams to go through the hassle of adding some other way of marking these.

    ------------------------------
    Jason Soares

    Viasat
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Add Relationship Type to Trace View options

    Posted 05-16-2019 13:42
    Hi Jason,

    My name is Julie and I'm one of the product managers here at Jama. I would like to understand more about what you are looking for. Would you expect to see this same relationship type in other areas of Connect?

    Thank you,
    Julie Goodner

    ------------------------------
    Julie Goodner
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Add Relationship Type to Trace View options

    Posted 05-16-2019 15:44
    For clarification, I am using a home instance of Jama, 8.33.1.

    Hi Julie, when using the Trace view, it's important in my case to be able to see the relationship type that a test case is using to relate to the requirement. Only test cases related with "verified by" relationship types are valid for calculating test coverage, while "assigned to" is a planned test, usually a placeholder.

    At a minimum, in the excel export, I would like to have an extra column between relationships with the relationship type populated. Trace view would be nice too, but is obviously more effort.


    ------------------------------
    Jason Soares

    Viasat
    ------------------------------