Support

 View Only

  • 1.  Synch/Lock bug

    Posted 10-03-2022 09:07
    So we just had an interesting thing happen, and im pretty sure this is a bug.
    User 1 has an object open on their computer.
    User 2 edits the same object on their computer making a user lock.
    User 1 does not refresh their browser, and transitions the lifecycle/workflow to a state that creates a system lock
    Jama does not give an error. It creates the system lock, performs the transition, but does not refresh the screen.
    After a refresh, the lifecycle/workflow transition is now grayed out, even though User 2 and Org Admin have a valid transition available because user 1 has the object locked still.
    This fact is not visible to admins/anyone but User 1.
    I had to as org admin, go clear the system lock manually, which revealed the user lock "underneath" which I then removed. (User 1 was gone for the day)

    Its weird to me that a user locked item can be transition out from under their change.

    FYI, we are running self hosted

    ------------------------------
    Rory Duncan
    NASA
    Kennedy Space Center FL
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Synch/Lock bug

    Posted 10-05-2022 12:18
    Hi Rory, 

    Quick question here -- is User 1 in this case set as an org admin, or are they set differently?

    ------------------------------
    Carly Rossi // she/her
    Community Manager // Jama Software
    Portland, OR
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 3.  RE: Synch/Lock bug

    Posted 10-05-2022 14:58
    Interesting,
    I had a similar issue some time ago. In my understanding it was related to SOS-DEF-5196 (fixed in 8.62).
    @Carly Rossi it is my past ticket at Jama Support #57052 (2nd part of ticket ...). Maybe it helps ...
    ​​

    ------------------------------
    Alessandro
    Systems Engineer
    SICK AG
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 4.  RE: Synch/Lock bug

    Posted 10-06-2022 10:35
    Thanks for sharing that, Alessandro! It's helpful in digging in here, and it sounds like they're adjacent (though I'm not sure they're related).

    In SOS-DEF-5196, user locks were able to be added on top of in-place system locks and, in this case, it sounds like the user lock was in place through User 2 before User 1 transitioned the project and creating the system lock. @Rory Duncan, is my understanding accurate?​

    ------------------------------
    Carly Rossi // she/her
    Community Manager // Jama Software
    Portland, OR
    ------------------------------

    Original Message