Hi Chole,
Is there any updates for this feature requests. As a workaround our teams are using comment function, which is really ugly. We want to use the tags after approval of the requirements for quick filtering to know if the requirements are derived on lower level or not yet.
Locking an item by the workflow is a good function, but such a limitation makes us to think, if we want to lock the items by workflow.
------------------------------
Karthick Ponnuswamy
Robert Bosch GmbH
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-20-2019 04:17
From: Christian Binard
Subject: Adding tags to locked items
I have also interest in fields w/o version control because I'd like to run automations that would populate some fields with information from related items (several levels below). This to build some Items' embedded summaries. Today, we create mini-reports to provide this overview but those need to be triggered manually each time. Automation is today disregarded because this would generate uncontrolled number of Item versions.
------------------------------
Christian Binard
ON semiconductor
Belgium
Original Message:
Sent: 08-20-2019 04:14
From: Christian Binard
Subject: Adding tags to locked items
Hi Chloe,
As use case, I'll refer you to Tim's Post (number 3)
"Teams want to modify tags after approval to then create custom filters based on the tags. E.g. you might tag 'internal' vs 'customer' for visibility on what requirements you are willing to share or tag 'datasheet' for results you have chosen to publish."
This would be a perfect match for fields w/o version control & lock: he knows upfront that a visibility field will be needed but he wants to lock his item before he has the visibility information.
I don't like the tags because anybody can create whatever tag so it needs a lot of discipline not to become a mess. Fields w/o version control & lock address that concern.
------------------------------
Christian Binard
ON semiconductor
Belgium
Original Message:
Sent: 08-19-2019 15:19
From: Chloe Elliott
Subject: Adding tags to locked items
Christian:
Enhancements to revision control would be considered a separate Product idea. Could you describe more on how you would utilize filters and fields (w/o version control & lock) to be an alternative to tag functionality?
Best,
------------------------------
Chloe Elliott
Jama Software
Portland OR
Original Message:
Sent: 08-16-2019 07:27
From: Christian Binard
Subject: Adding tags to locked items
It makes sense to allow Tags changes on a locked item because Tags are not revision controlled.
Locking should have no impact on properties that are not revision controlled: locations, tags …
I support your Ideal, Jeffrey, but to keep it according to the rule above, I'd like to be able to configure fields as excluded from the revision control system and so from the lock.
Fields without revision control & lock would be an alternative to tags to define after-facts filters a more structured way.
------------------------------
Christian Binard
ON semiconductor
Original Message:
Sent: 08-02-2019 20:05
From: Jeffrey Tsang
Subject: Adding tags to locked items
More generically it would be great to have a check box when configuring item fields to not lock the field. Much like syncing or not syncing the field
------------------------------
Jeffrey
Original Message:
Sent: 08-01-2019 10:12
From: Chloe Elliott
Subject: Adding tags to locked items
Hello,
This Idea seems to be getting a lot of traction lately! How are you currently utilizing our Tag function to categorize and organize your projects?
Best,
------------------------------
Chloe Elliott
Jama Software
Portland OR
Original Message:
Sent: 08-01-2019 08:19
From: Alessandro Valli
Subject: Adding tags to locked items
+1 also from my side
------------------------------
Alessandro
Original Message:
Sent: 08-01-2019 06:52
From: Lien Bäcker
Subject: Adding tags to locked items
This function would be also very useful for us. So one more vote from us.
Lien
----
Gira Giersiepen GmbH & Co. KG
Original Message------
This kind of need has also raised in our environment. Please consider enabling the functionality.
------------------------------
Anja
Finland
------------------------------