Relationships for Components
I have found out that it is possible to set relationships for Components, but not for Sets/Folders.
I was expecting either all or none. Is there a reason for enabling Relationships for Components?
Best,
Systems Engineer
SICK AG
Comments
-
Decoteau Wilkerson Jama Staff, Data Exchange, Moderator, Automotive Solution, Medical Devices & Life Sciences Solution, Robotics Solution, Airborne Systems, Jama Connect Interchange™ (JCI), Jama Validation Kit (JVK) + Functional Safety Kit (FSK) Posts: 47Hi Alessandro,
Thank you for reaching out! The Component should be in line with Sets and Folders. I would recommend not enabling relationships for a Component.
Please note, I have filed a defect for this issue - SOS-DEF-5056 - and have related this conversation to it.You can check future release notes for this ID to see if this bug has been fixed.
Please let me know if you have any questions!Decoteau Wilkerson
Content Marketing Specialist
Jama Software
Oregon0 -
@Decoteau Wilkerson Can I check what the defect is specifically? We use relationships to components to allocate requirements to subsystems that will satisfy them before the downstream requirements with a satisfies relationship are created. This functionality has recently broken for us.
I really dont want to find components have had the relationships turned off to bring them into line with sets and folders to 'fix' this issue.
------------------------------
Tim Kerby
CEO
Edinburgh Systems
Edinburgh
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-08-2020 16:38
From: Decoteau Wilkerson
Subject: Relationships for Components
Hi Alessandro,
Thank you for reaching out! The Component should be in line with Sets and Folders. I would recommend not enabling relationships for a Component.
Please note, I have filed a defect for this issue - SOS-DEF-5056 - and have related this conversation to it.You can check future release notes for this ID to see if this bug has been fixed.
Please let me know if you have any questions!
------------------------------
Decoteau Wilkerson
Jama Software
OR
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-08-2020 07:18
From: Alessandro Valli
Subject: Relationships for Components
Hi all,
I have found out that it is possible to set relationships for Components, but not for Sets/Folders.
I was expecting either all or none. Is there a reason for enabling Relationships for Components?
Best,
------------------------------
Alessandro
Systems Engineer
SICK AG
------------------------------
0 -
Amanda Jennewein Jama Staff, Vertical Solutions Moderator, Data Exchange, Administrator, Automotive Solution, Medical Devices & Life Sciences Solution, Robotics Solution, Airborne Systems, Functional Safety Kit (FSK), Jama Connect Interchange™ (JCI), Jama Validation Kit (JVK) + Functional Safety Kit (FSK), Product Manager Moderator, JVK+FSK Moderator Posts: 25
Hello Tim,
Thank you for posting on this support discussion. As the post you replied to was made in 2020, the best way to identify if you are experiencing an open defect is to submit a request at the Jama Software® Support Site. Include as many details and examples as possible. Thank you!
------------------------------
Amanda Jennewein She/Her
Manager, Customer Support
Jama Software
Portland OR
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 03-05-2024 06:25
From: Tim Kerby
Subject: Relationships for Components@Decoteau Wilkerson Can I check what the defect is specifically? We use relationships to components to allocate requirements to subsystems that will satisfy them before the downstream requirements with a satisfies relationship are created. This functionality has recently broken for us.
I really dont want to find components have had the relationships turned off to bring them into line with sets and folders to 'fix' this issue.
------------------------------
Tim Kerby
CEO
Edinburgh Systems
Edinburgh
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-08-2020 16:38
From: Decoteau Wilkerson
Subject: Relationships for Components
Hi Alessandro,
Thank you for reaching out! The Component should be in line with Sets and Folders. I would recommend not enabling relationships for a Component.
Please note, I have filed a defect for this issue - SOS-DEF-5056 - and have related this conversation to it.You can check future release notes for this ID to see if this bug has been fixed.
Please let me know if you have any questions!
------------------------------
Decoteau Wilkerson
Jama Software
OR
Original Message:
Sent: 10-08-2020 07:18
From: Alessandro Valli
Subject: Relationships for Components
Hi all,
I have found out that it is possible to set relationships for Components, but not for Sets/Folders.
I was expecting either all or none. Is there a reason for enabling Relationships for Components?
Best,
------------------------------
Alessandro
Systems Engineer
SICK AG
------------------------------
Amanda Jennewein She/Her/Hers
Head of Support
Jama Software®0