Relationships for Components

Alessandro Valli
Alessandro Valli Member, Data Exchange, Jama Connect Interchange™ (JCI) Posts: 789
edited March 13 in Peer-to-Peer Support Forum
Hi all,
I have found out that it is possible to set relationships for Components, but not for Sets/Folders.
I was expecting either all or none. Is there a reason for enabling Relationships for Components?
Best,
Alessandro
Systems Engineer
SICK AG

Comments

  • Decoteau Wilkerson
    Decoteau Wilkerson Jama Staff, Data Exchange, Moderator, Automotive Solution, Medical Devices & Life Sciences Solution, Robotics Solution, Airborne Systems, Jama Connect Interchange™ (JCI), Jama Validation Kit (JVK) + Functional Safety Kit (FSK) Posts: 47
    edited October 2020
    Hi Alessandro, 

    Thank you for reaching out! The Component should be in line with Sets and Folders. I would recommend not enabling relationships for a Component.

    Please note, I have filed a defect for this issue - SOS-DEF-5056 - and have related this conversation to it. 

    You can check future release notes for this ID to see if this bug has been fixed.

    Please let me know if you have any questions!
    Decoteau Wilkerson
    Content Marketing Specialist
    Jama Software
    Oregon
  • Tim Kerby
    Tim Kerby Member, Functional Safety Kit (FSK) Posts: 14
    edited March 5

    @Decoteau Wilkerson Can I check what the defect is specifically? We use relationships to components to allocate requirements to subsystems that will satisfy them before the downstream requirements with a satisfies relationship are created. This functionality has recently broken for us.

    I really dont want to find components have had the relationships turned off to bring them into line with sets and folders to 'fix' this issue. 

    ------------------------------
    Tim Kerby
    CEO
    Edinburgh Systems
    Edinburgh
    ------------------------------
    -------------------------------------------
    Original Message:
    Sent: 10-08-2020 16:38
    From: Decoteau Wilkerson
    Subject: Relationships for Components

    Hi Alessandro, 

    Thank you for reaching out! The Component should be in line with Sets and Folders. I would recommend not enabling relationships for a Component.

    Please note, I have filed a defect for this issue - SOS-DEF-5056 - and have related this conversation to it. 

    You can check future release notes for this ID to see if this bug has been fixed.

    Please let me know if you have any questions!

    ------------------------------
    Decoteau Wilkerson
    Jama Software
    OR
    ------------------------------

    Original Message:
    Sent: 10-08-2020 07:18
    From: Alessandro Valli
    Subject: Relationships for Components

    Hi all,
    I have found out that it is possible to set relationships for Components, but not for Sets/Folders.
    I was expecting either all or none. Is there a reason for enabling Relationships for Components?
    Best,

    ------------------------------
    Alessandro
    Systems Engineer
    SICK AG
    ------------------------------
  • Amanda Jennewein
    Amanda Jennewein Jama Staff, Vertical Solutions Moderator, Data Exchange, Administrator, Automotive Solution, Medical Devices & Life Sciences Solution, Robotics Solution, Airborne Systems, Functional Safety Kit (FSK), Jama Connect Interchange™ (JCI), Jama Validation Kit (JVK) + Functional Safety Kit (FSK), Product Manager Moderator, JVK+FSK Moderator Posts: 25
    edited March 5

    Hello Tim,

    Thank you for posting on this support discussion. As the post you replied to was made in 2020, the best way to identify if you are experiencing an open defect is to submit a request at the Jama Software® Support Site. Include as many details and examples as possible. Thank you!

    ------------------------------
    Amanda Jennewein She/Her
    Manager, Customer Support
    Jama Software
    Portland OR
    ------------------------------
    -------------------------------------------
    Original Message:
    Sent: 03-05-2024 06:25
    From: Tim Kerby
    Subject: Relationships for Components

    @Decoteau Wilkerson Can I check what the defect is specifically? We use relationships to components to allocate requirements to subsystems that will satisfy them before the downstream requirements with a satisfies relationship are created. This functionality has recently broken for us.

    I really dont want to find components have had the relationships turned off to bring them into line with sets and folders to 'fix' this issue. 

    ------------------------------
    Tim Kerby
    CEO
    Edinburgh Systems
    Edinburgh
    ------------------------------

    Original Message:
    Sent: 10-08-2020 16:38
    From: Decoteau Wilkerson
    Subject: Relationships for Components

    Hi Alessandro, 

    Thank you for reaching out! The Component should be in line with Sets and Folders. I would recommend not enabling relationships for a Component.

    Please note, I have filed a defect for this issue - SOS-DEF-5056 - and have related this conversation to it. 

    You can check future release notes for this ID to see if this bug has been fixed.

    Please let me know if you have any questions!

    ------------------------------
    Decoteau Wilkerson
    Jama Software
    OR

    Original Message:
    Sent: 10-08-2020 07:18
    From: Alessandro Valli
    Subject: Relationships for Components

    Hi all,
    I have found out that it is possible to set relationships for Components, but not for Sets/Folders.
    I was expecting either all or none. Is there a reason for enabling Relationships for Components?
    Best,

    ------------------------------
    Alessandro
    Systems Engineer
    SICK AG
    ------------------------------
    Amanda Jennewein She/Her/Hers
    Head of Support
    Jama Software®

Categories